Halfway through the article one reads the following quote:
Allowing untrained and unlicensed people carrying guns in national parks is an invitation to disaster," said John Waterman, president of the U.S. Park Rangers Lodge.Even though prior to that idiotic statement the article correctly states how the new law would apply in California:
Now under the new rule visitors can legally carry a loaded gun into a park or wildlife refuge - but only if the person has a permit for a concealed weapon and if the state where the park or refuge is located also allows concealed firearms. California allows concealed weapons.So, people who can legally carry weapons into the parks will NOT be unlicensed, and they will NOT be untrained, because CCW licenses have a training requirement. One would think that Mr. Waterman, president of a park rangers organization, would be more informed than he seems to be.
In actuality, the new policy changes almost nothing in California. CCW issuance is very limited. Take a look at the CCW permit issuance statistics released by the California Department of Justice. In 2007 there were only 40296 permits in the entire state (population in 2008: 33.8 million), and since California does not recognize any other state's concealed carry permits, non-resident visitors to national parks in California are not able to carry their firearms legally in California national parks.
The sky is not falling, the new law affects almost nobody.