I have written before about the California Department of Justice Roster of Handguns Certified for Sale, concluding that this system was not a creeping handgun ban based on the information I could get at the time, which was simply the total number of guns on the list.
My method ignored the types of new guns that were being approved, the types expiring and being removed, and the types newly approved and added. Just last month many new guns were added, but most are classified as derringers, but only one semi-automatic pistol. I have yet to find a list of new semi-automatic pistol models that have been introduced in the United States firearms market, but I suspect that it is more than the handful of pistols added to the Roster in recent years.
The most common culprit cited is the California requirement that all new pistols be equipment with a magazine disconnect mechanism, a device that prevents the pistol from discharging when the magazine is absent from the magazine well. Most pistol manufacturers either refuse to market pistols with these devices, or their designs cannot accommodate a magazine disconnect.
Now we come to a new pistol offered for sale by Remington, the Model 1911 R1, Remington's entry into the ever more popular G.I. .45 pistol market. This pistol is pretty much a copy of the Colt 1911A1 pistol used by the U.S. military for over 80 years, and it is one of the most popular pistol models in the United States. But this pistol will never be available in California, because this pistol does not have a magazine disconnect feature, and is therefore "unsafe".
Note that my own Kimber Custom II also lacks a magazine disconnect, and is just as "unsafe" as the new Remington gun, but the Custom II was certified for sale before the magazine disconnect requirement, and so that model is "grandfathered in" and will remain certified as long as Kimber maintains the listing by paying the yearly fee.
But note the arbitrariness of this law: very similar guns, one "new", one old, but both are very similar to each other, but one is declared "unsafe". The net effect is that one model of gun is banned from the California market.
The roster is beginning to look more and more like a creeping handgun ban. I just wish I had more industry data to support it.